000			03405nam a2200337 a 4500
008			200219s2020 xxk 001 0deng d
020			_a9781292286747 _qpaperback _cRM106.48 (PUU)
040			_aUKM _erda
090			_aC29.1 _b.W548 2020 2
100	1		_aWilson, William, _d1953-, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aCriminal law / _cWilliam Wilson.
250			_aSeventh edition.
264		1	_aUnited Kingdom: _bPearson, _c2020.
264		4	_c©2020.
300			_axlv, 643 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aLongman law series.
500			_aPuan Shaizimah Badzri (Bacaan Asas FUU)/ Ketua Perpustakaan Undang-Undang/ shai@ukm.edu.my/ 0389216390/ OC/ Bookline Services
505	0		_aUnderstanding criminal law -- Decisions to criminalise -- Punishment -- Actus reus -- Causation -- Mens rea -- Strict liability -- Relationship between actus reus and mens rea -- Defences (1) -- Defences (2) : affirmative defences -- Non-fatal offences -- Sexual offences -- Homicide -- Theft -- Fraud and making off without payment -- Other property offences -- Criminal damage -- Inchoate offences -- Complicity.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index. (601-643 pages)
520			_a'This is the seventh edition of this book. A number of interesting developments have occurred since the last edition. Some of the highlights are as follows: Most noteworthy is the case of Ivey v Genting (2017) in which the Supreme Court returned dishonesty to its pre Ghosh (1982) meaning. Two cases on joint enterprise - Mitchell (2018) and Tas (2018), typify the persisting problems governing joint enterprise post Jogee (2016). Tas also raises questions about the continued significance of Rafferty (2007) on supervening acts. Likewise Wallace raises its own questions about the notion of a voluntary act in the context of breaking the chain of causation most notably raised in Kennedy (2007). Loake v CPS [2017] EWHC 2855 (Admin) DC makes an important clarification of how insanity is a general defence and not limited to crimes of mens rea. R v Kay (2017) addresses the question of the relationship between psychosis and intoxication for the purpose of diminished responsibility. Ray (2017) affirms the ruling in Collins (2015) on the question of reasonableness in householder cases and Cheeseman (2019 rules that the householder defence is available to a person who had caused injury to another person who had entered a premises lawfully but had then become a trespasser. Finally two cases on consent in the context of non fatal offences against the person. Melin (2019) qualifies Richardson (1999) on the effect of fraudulent misrepresentation on apparent consent in cases involving surgical operations and comparable activities. R v BM makes an important clarification of the need for non clinical forms of body alteration to satisfy the public interest. I would like to express my grateful thanks to Roma Dash, Archana Makhija and all the team at Pearson for their patience and professionalism'-- _c Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aCriminal law _zEngland.
907			_a.b17022265 _b2024-05-02 _c2024-02-21
942			_c01 _n0 _kC29.1 .W548 2020 2
949			_o200469948
990			_ahafiffy/nmj
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2024-02-21 _cm _da _feng _gxxk _y0 _z.b17022265
999			_c668888 _d668888