000 02895nam a2200349 a 4500
008 200219s2021 enk 001 0 eng d
020 _a9781509947225
_qpaperback
_cRM257.90 (PUU)
040 _aUKM
_erda
090 _aC18
_b.P6554 2021 2
100 1 _aPollicino, Oreste,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aJudicial protection of fundamental rights on the internet :
_ba road towards digital constitutionalism? /
_cOreste Pollicino.
264 1 _aNew York:
_bHart Publishing, Bloomsburry Publishing Plc,
_c©2021.
264 4 _c©2021.
300 _axxiii, 235 pages ;
_c23 cm.
336 _atext
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_2rdacarrier
500 _aDr. Nurhafilah Musa/ Fakulti Undang-Undang/ hafilah@ukm.edu.my/ 0389216364/ Pemilihan Pensyarah/ OC/ Ashe Enterprise
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Technology and judges across the Atlantic -- Judges and freedom of expression : from atoms to bits across the Atlantic -- Judges, privacy and data protection : from atoms to bits across the Atlantic -- The judicial bridges of privacy and speech in the information society -- The courts and private powers in the world of bits : towards digital constitutionalism?
520 _a'This book explores how the Internet impacts on the protection of fundamental rights, particularly with regard to freedom of speech and privacy. In doing so, it seeks to bridge the gap between Internet Law and European and Constitutional Law. The book aims to emancipate the debate on Internet Law and Jurisprudence from the dominant position, with specific reference to European legal regimes. This approach aims to inject a European and constitutional'soul' into the topic. Moreover, the book addresses the relationship between new technologies and the protection of fundamental rights within the theoretical debate surrounding the process of European integration, with particular emphasis on judicial dialogue. This innovative book provides a thorough analysis of the forms, models and styles of judicial protection of fundamental rights in the digital era and compares the European vision to that of the United States. The book offers the first comparative analysis in which the notion of (judicial) frame, borrowed from linguistic and cognitive studies, is systematically applied to the theories of interpretation and argumentation'--
_c Provided by publisher.
650 0 _aInternet governance
_xLaw and legislation.
650 0 _aFreedom of expression.
650 0 _aData protection
_xLaw and legislation.
650 0 _aPolitical questions and judicial power.
907 _a.b16971000
_b2023-06-20
_c2023-03-09
942 _c01
_n0
_kC18 .P6554 2021 2
949 _o200469669
990 _ahafiffy/nmj
991 _aFakulti Undang-Undang
998 _au
_b2023-03-09
_cm
_da
_feng
_gnyu
_y0
_z.b16971000
999 _c663967
_d663967