000			03830cam a22004218i 4500
001			21431665
005			20250919142112.0
006			m |o d |
007			cr_|||||||||||
008			200201s2020 enk ob 001 0 eng
010			_a 2019050735
020			_a9781315161334 _q(ebook)
020			_z9781138063006 _q(hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda
042			_apcc
082	0	0	_a327.101 _223
090	0	0	_aJZ1305
245	0	0	_aGoing beyond parochialism and fragmentation in the study of international relations / _cedited by Yong-Soo Eun.
263			_a2002
264		1	_aAbingdon, Oxon ; _aNew York, NY : _bRoutledge, _c2020.
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bn _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aOpening up the debate over'non-Western' international relations / Yong-Soo Eun -- When balance of power meets globalization / T.V. Paul -- Three-ness : healing world politics with epistemic compassion / L.H.M. Ling -- Relational ontology and the politics of boundarymaking : East Asian financial regionalism / Yong Wook Lee -- Bringing the outside in : the limits of theoretical fragmentation and pluralism in IR theory / Colin Wight -- Globalising IR through dialogue / Yong-Soo Eun -- Global emotion studies in IR : embracing non-Western voices / Chaeyoung Yong.
520			_a'International Relations (IR), as a discipline, is a western dominated enterprise. This has led to calls to broaden the scope and vision of the discipline by embracing a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives - particularly those outside the Anglo-American core of the West. The ongoing'broadening IR projects' - be they'non-Western IR','post-Western IR', or'Global IR' - are making contributions in this regard. However, some careful thinking is needed here in that these attempts could also lead to a national or regional'inwardness' that works to reproduce the very parochialism that is being challenged. The main intellectual concerns of this edited volume are problematising Western parochialism in IR; giving theoretical and epistemological substance to pluralism in the field of IR based on both Western and non-Western thoughts and experiences; and working out ways to move the discipline of IR one step closer to a dialogic community. A key issue that cuts across all contributions in the volume is to go beyond both parochialism and fragmentation in international studies. In order to address the manifold and contested implications of pluralism in in the field of IR, the volume draws on the wealth of experience and research of prominent and emerging IR scholars whose contributions make up the work, with a mixture of theoretical analysis and case studies. This book will appeal to scholars and students interested in Global IR and promoting dialogue in a pluralist IR'-- _cProvided by publisher.
588			_aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
650		0	_aInternational relations _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aEast and West.
650		0	_aCultural pluralism.
700	1		_aEun, Yong-Soo, _eeditor.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _tGoing beyond parochialism and fragmentation in the study of international relations _dAbingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. _z9781138063006 _w(DLC) 2019050734
907			_a.b16853489 _b2021-02-12 _c2021-02-12
942			_n0 _kJZ1305
998			_a1 _b2021-02-12 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16853489
999			_c652680 _d652680