000			02637nam a22003978i 4500
001			CR9781107110311
005			20250919142046.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			130411s2014||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781107110311 (ebook)
020			_z9781107046627 (hardback)
020			_z9781107678828 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
050	0	0	_aK2263 _b.W348 2014
082	0	0	_a347/.06 _223
100	1		_aWalton, Douglas N., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aBurden of proof, presumption and argumentation / _cDouglas Walton, University of Windsor, Canada.
246	3		_aBurden of Proof, Presumption & Argumentation
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2014.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 307 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction to basic concepts; 2. Burdens of proof in legal reasoning; 3. Presumption in legal reasoning; 4. Shifting of the burden of proof in witness testimony; 5. Burden of proof in dialogue systems; 6. Solving the problems of burden of proof; 7. Burdens of proof in different types of dialogue; 8. Burdens of proof in everyday conversational arguments.
520			_aThe notion of burden of proof and its companion notion of presumption are central to argumentation studies. This book argues that we can learn a lot from how the courts have developed procedures over the years for allocating and reasoning with presumptions and burdens of proof, and from how artificial intelligence has built precise formal and computational systems to represent this kind of reasoning. The book provides a model of reasoning with burden of proof and presumption, based on analyses of many clearly explained legal and non-legal examples. The model is shown to fit cases of everyday conversational argumentation as well as argumentation in legal cases. Burden of proof determines (1) under what conditions an arguer is obliged to support a claim with an argument that backs it up and (2) how strong that argument needs to be to prove the claim in question.
650		0	_aBurden of proof.
650		0	_aProof theory.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781107046627
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107110311
907			_a.b16846084 _b2020-12-22 _c2020-12-22
942			_n0
998			_a1 _b2020-12-22 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16846084
999			_c651951 _d651951