000			03441cam a2200457 i 4500
005			20250919121950.0
008			180208t20142014njuab bi a001 0 eng
020			_a9780691173795 _cRM113.75
020			_a0691159068
039		9	_a201806281643 _bashikin _c201806041657 _dmasrul _y02-08-2018 _zmasrul
040			_aYDXCP _beng _cYDXCP _dUKM _erda
043			_ae-uk---
090			_aC13.5KD.E733 2
090			_aC13.5KD _b.E733 2
100	1		_aErikson, Emily, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aBetween monopoly and free trade : _bthe English East India Company, 1600-1757 / _cEmily Erikson.
264		1	_aPrinceton : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2014].
264		4	_c@2014.
300			_axiii, 252 pages : _billustrations, map ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aPrinceton analytical sociology series
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 203-229) and index.
505	0	0	_gIntroduction -- _tMerchant capitalism and the great transition -- _tThe European trade with the East Indies -- _tSocial networks and the East Indiaman -- _tDecentralization, corruption, and market structure -- _tThe Eastern ports -- _tEastern institutions and the English trade -- _gConclusions.
520			_a'The English East India Company was one of the most powerful and enduring organizations in history. Between Monopoly and Free Trade locates the source of that success in the innovative policy by which the Company's Court of Directors granted employees the right to pursue their own commercial interests while in the firm's employ. Exploring trade network dynamics, decision-making processes, and ports and organizational context, Emily Erikson demonstrates why the English East India Company was a dominant force in the expansion of trade between Europe and Asia, and she sheds light on the related problems of why England experienced rapid economic development and how the relationship between Europe and Asia shifted in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Though the Company held a monopoly on English overseas trade to Asia, the Court of Directors extended the right to trade in Asia to their employees, creating an unusual situation in which employees worked both for themselves and for the Company as overseas merchants. Building on the organizational infrastructure of the Company and the sophisticated commercial institutions of the markets of the East, employees constructed a cohesive internal network of peer communications that directed English trading ships during their voyages. This network integrated Company operations, encouraged innovation, and increased the Company's flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to local circumstance. Between Monopoly and Free Trade highlights the dynamic potential of social networks in the early modern era.'--Book jacket.
610	2	0	_aEast India Company _xHistory.
650		0	_aFree trade _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aCapitalism _y17th century.
650		0	_aCapitalism _y18th century.
650		0	_aSocial networks.
830		0	_aPrinceton analytical sociology series
907			_a.b16562896 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC13.5KD.E733 2
914			_avtls003631312
990			_anmy
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2018-08-02 _cm _da _feng _gnju _y0 _z.b16562896
999			_c624777 _d624777