000			03964nam a2200421I 4500
005			20250919121944.0
006			m o d
007			cr un|||||||||
008			181220s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020			_a9781787430679 (e-book)
035			_a(UtOrBLW)ovld002108180
039		9	_a201812201104 _bhafiz _y02-05-2018 _zhafiz
040			_aUtOrBLW
050		4	_aHD7287 _b.K56 2017
072		7	_aVFVG _2bicssc _2bicssc
072		7	_aSOC026010 _2bisacsh _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a363.5 _223
100	1		_aKing, Peter, _d1960- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aLiving alone, living together : _btwo essays on the use of housing / _cby Peter King.
264		1	_aBingley, U.K. : _bEmerald Publishing Limited, _c2017.
264		4	_c©2017
300			_a1 online resource (153 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_aThe book considers how a dwelling can protect and promote both our anxieties and our relationships. Dwelling magnifies our anxieties and allows us to reject the world, yet it is also what we need to form long and lasting relationships.The first long essay considers the one truly private space we have: inside our heads. This is the most intimate place we have, yet we are singularly unable to control it or even to know it. We cannot visualise it and we cannot determine what enters and what comes out. These leads to a discussion on anxiety and depression and how the solitude offered by private space - the head and the home - allows for anxiety to take over an individual. But it is also suggested that it is only through the privacy of a dwelling, and the intimacies that can develop here, that anxiety can be assuaged. The essay is written in a fragmentary manner to show the often contradictory or conflicting nature of our headspace: it often appears that there are many conflicting voices in our head and the essay seeks to reflect these differences.The second essay is based on the premise that our relationships come out of our private dwelling. We need the protected intimacy, the inclusion and exclusion of private dwelling in order to flourish and to grow, and if we are to live together in a fully committed manner we depend on this enclosed and excluding space. The significance our lives are spun out of this particular space. Living together expands what is mine by creating what is ours, a oneness out of two people. This closeness requires enclosure and exclusion, which allows us to nurture and protect others as well as ourselves. It is this sense of ours, which each of us holds, that allows us to be free. But this closeness can be perverted by aspiration and the controlling impulses of the ego. Living together is where we are without ego or aspiration. It is characterised rather by inwardness, complacency and stasis. And only once we have this are we able to move freely outwards into the world, knowing as we go that there is somewhere that is ours. Both essays use a non-tradition literature to explore being alone and being with others rather than relying on the social science literature. Likewise, the essays take an introspective approach that recognises the subjectivity of the relations at play here. The aim of the book is build up a distinctly new picture of dwelling and housing from first principles without any particular reliance on the existing literature and approaches.
650		0	_aHousing.
650		7	_aSocial Science _xSociology / Marriage & Family. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aDating, relationships, living together & marriage. _2bicssc
776			_z9781787430686
856	4	0	_uhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/book/10.1108/9781787430679
907			_a.b16561272 _b2019-11-14 _c2019-11-12
942			_n0
914			_avtls003631143
998			_anone _b2018-05-02 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16561272
999			_c624622 _d624622