000			04359cam a2200553 i 4500
005			20250919011755.0
008			160414s2013 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a2013-026364
020			_a9780415659581 (hardback)
020			_a0415659582 (hardback)
020			_z9780203074855 (ebk)
020			_z9780203074855 (ePub ebook)
020			_z0203074858 (ePub ebook)
039		9	_y04-14-2016 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aKZ1269 _b.C659 2013
082	0	0	_a341.26 _223
100	1		_aColeman, Andrew _c(Law teacher)
245	1	0	_aResolving claims to self-determination : _bis there a role for the International Court of Justice? / _cAndrew K. Coleman.
264		1	_aMilton Park, Abingdon, Oxon : _bRoutledge, _c2013.
300			_axii, 357 pages ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aRoutledge research in international law
500			_aBased on the author's thesis (Ph. D.).
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 321-345) and index.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aDetermining the legitimacy of claims for self-determination -- The determination of statehood -- The International Court of Justice and claims to self-determination -- The International Court of Justice and highly political matters.
520			_a'Since the end of World War Two and the formation of the UN, the nature of warfare has undergone changes with many wars being'intra-state' wars or wars of secession. Whilst wars of succession do not involve the same number or type of combatants as in the last two World Wars, their potential for destruction and their danger for the international community cannot be underestimated. There are currently many peoples seeking independence from what they perceive as foreign and alien rulers including the Chechens, West Papuans, Achenese, Tibetans, and the Kurds. The break-up of Yugoslavia and the former USSR, together with recent conflicts in South Ossetia, reveal that the potential for future wars of secession remains high.This book explores the relationship between recognition, statehood and self-determination showing how self-determination continues to be relevant beyond European decolonisation. The book considers how and why unresolved questions of self-determination have the potential to become violent, arguing that violence is more likely because there are currently no clear and fair ways to peaceable determine how claims for self-determination should be decided. The book then goes on to investigate whether the International Court of Justice, as the primary judicial organ of the United Nations could successfully resolve questions of self-determination through the application of legal analysis and principles of international law. The book assesses whether the ICJ is a suitable forum, looking at the strengths and weaknesses of the Court's advisory jurisdiction, as well as how effective the Court is in view of the absence of any international police force or enforcement powers. The issue of whether the ICJ's jurisdiction in its current form will permit people to access the Court's jurisdiction to claim for self-determination is considered along with what changes would need to be made in order for it to provide an effective means for the peaceful'birth' of States'-- _cProvided by publisher.
610	2	0	_aInternational Court of Justice.
650		0	_aSelf-determination, National
650		0	_aInternational courts _xPolitical aspects.
650		0	_aPolitical questions and judicial power.
650		7	_aLAW / International. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aLAW / Courts. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aLAW / General. _2bisacsh
907			_a.b16310779 _b2019-11-14 _c2019-11-12
942			_n0
914			_avtls003604496
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_anone _b2016-01-04 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16310779
999			_c608600 _d608600