000			02751cam a2200397 i 4500
005			20250919002930.0
008			150413t20152015enk 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107029835 _qhardback
020			_a110702983X _qhardback
039		9	_a201512151500 _badnan _c201512151458 _dadnan _c201511171444 _dmasrul _y04-13-2015 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dOCLCO _dBTCTA _dOCLCF _dUKM _erda
090			_aC29.1.D643 2
090			_aC29.1 _b.D643 2
100	1		_aDonnelly-Lazarov, Bebhinn, _eauthor.
245	1	2	_aA philosophy of criminal attempts / _cBebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov.
264		1	_aCambridge, UK : _bCambridge University Press, _c2015.
264		4	_c©2015
300			_axiv, 238 pages ; _c25 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: Part I. The Anatomy of Attempts: 1. Attempts and intention; 2. Attempts and action; 3. Attempts and subjectivity; 4. Attempts and possibility; Part II. Application to Criminal Attempts: 5. Actus reus and mens rea; 6. Impossibility and extraordinariness in criminal attempts; 7. Criminal attempts and moral luck; 8. Reckless attempts?; 9. Inchoate theft and inchoate rape.
520			_a'An investigation of criminal attempts unearths some of the most fundamental, intriguing and perplexing questions about criminal law and its place in human action. When does attempting begin? What is the relationship between attempting and intending? Do we always attempt the possible and, if so, possible to whom? Does attempting involve action and does action involve attempting? Is my attempt fixed by me or can another perspective reveal what it is? How'much' action is needed for an attempt, how'much' intention is needed and can these matters be decided categorically? Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov's answers to these questions will interest criminal law theorists, philosophers and lawyers or law reformers, who encounter the mixed practical and philosophical phenomenon of attempting. Inspired by G. E. M. Anscombe's philosophy, Part I examines attempting generally and its relationship with intention, action subjectivity, and possibility. From the conclusions reached, Part II proposes a specific theory of criminal attempts'-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aCriminal attempt.
650		0	_aCriminal intent.
650		0	_aCriminal act.
650		0	_aCriminal law.
907			_a.b16120176 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC29.1.D643 2
914			_avtls003583733
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2015-01-04 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16120176
999			_c590953 _d590953