000			04038cam a2200493 i 4500
005			20250919002926.0
008			150413t20132013enka b 001 0 eng
020			_a9780415548618 _qhardback
020			_a0415548616 _qhardback _cRM183.42
020			_a9780203098189 _qebook
020			_a0203098188 _qebook
020			_a9780415630016 _qpaperback
020			_a0415630010 _qpaperback
039		9	_a201512151423 _badnan _c201511171140 _dmasrul _y04-13-2015 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dYDX _dOCLCO _dYDXCP _dRCJ _dCGU _dBWX _dYLS _dUKMGB _dONS _dGWL _dCOO _dOCLCF _dUNBCA _dOCLCQ _dUKM _erda
043			_ae-uk-en _ae-uk-wl
090			_aC21.61KD.R334 2
090			_aC21.61KD _b.R334 2
100	1		_aRackley, Erika, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aWomen, judging and the judiciary : _bfrom difference to diversity / _cErika Rackley.
264		1	_aMilton Park, Abingdon, Oxon : _bRoutledge, _c2013.
264		4	_c©2013
300			_axv, 226 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
500			_a'A GlassHouse book.'
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 203-220) and index.
505	0		_aPositioning the woman judge -- Delivering diversity in the legal profession -- How we appoint judges -- Representations of the woman judge : revisiting the little mermaid -- Difference and the default judge -- Making the argument for judicial diversity.
520			_a'Women, Judging and the Judiciary examines debates about gender representation in the judiciary and the importance of judicial diversity. It offers a fresh look at the role of the (woman) judge and the process of judging and provides a new analysis of the assumptions which underpin and constrain debates about why we might want a more diverse judiciary, and how we might get one. Through a theoretical engagement with the concepts of diversity and difference in adjudication, Women, Judging and the Judiciary contends that prevailing images of the judge are enmeshed in notions of sameness and uniformity: images which are so familiar that their grip on our understandings of the judicial role are routinely overlooked. Failing to confront these instinctive images of the judge and of judging, however, comes at a price. They exclude those who do not fit this mould, setting them up as challengers to the judicial norm. Such has been the fate of the woman judge. But while this goes some way to explaining why, despite repeated efforts, our attempts to secure greater diversity in our judiciary have fallen short, it also points a way forward. For, by getting a clearer sense of what our judges really do and how they do it, we can see that women judges and judicial diversity more broadly do not threaten but rather enrich the judiciary and judicial decision-making. As such, the standard opponent to measures to increase judicial diversity--the necessity of appointment on merit--is in fact its greatest ally: a judiciary is stronger and the justice it dispenses better the greater the diversity of its members, so if we want the best judiciary we can get, we should want one which is fully diverse. Women, Judging and the Judiciary will be of interest to legal academics, lawyers and policy makers working in the fields of judicial diversity, gender and adjudication and, more broadly, to anyone interested in who our judges are and what they do'--Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aWomen judges _zEngland.
650		0	_aSex discrimination against women _xLaw and legislation _zEngland.
650		0	_aWomen judges _zWales.
650		0	_aSex discrimination against women _xLaw and legislation _zWales.
650		0	_aWomen judges.
650		0	_aSex discrimination against women _xLaw and legislation.
907			_a.b16119411 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC21.61KD.R334 2
914			_avtls003583653
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2015-01-04 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b16119411
999			_c590882 _d590882