000			05812cam a2200409 i 4500
005			20250918234519.0
008			140425t2013 enkk b 000 0 eng
020			_a9781781004029 _qhardback _cRM1506.18
020			_a1781004021 _qhardback
039		9	_a201708070909 _badnan _c201409151252 _dadnan _c201408290849 _dmasrul _y04-25-2014 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dDLC _dUKM _erda
090			_aC74.3.H834 2
090			_aC74.3 _b.H834 2
245	0	0	_aHuman rights and non-state actors / _cedited by Andrew Clapham.
264		1	_aCheltenham, UK : _bEdward Elgar Publishing Limited, _c[2013]
264		4	_c©2013
300			_axxix, 960 pages : _bforms ; _c25 cm.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aHuman rights law ; _v5
490	0		_aAn Elgar research collection
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages ix-xi).
505	0		_aIntroduction Andrew Clapham PART I GENERAL 1. Andrew Clapham (2010),'Non-State Actors' 2. Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat (2006),'Looking beyond the State But Not Ignoring It' 3. Christine Chinkin (1998),'International Law and Human Rights' 4. Robert McCorquodale (2010),'Non-state Actors and International Human Rights Law' 5. Jan Arno Hessbruegge (2005),'Human Rights Violations Arising from Conduct of Non-State Actors' 6. Manisuli Ssenyonjo (2008),'The Applicability of International Human Rights Law to Non-State Actors: What Relevance to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?' 7. Aoife Nolan (2009),'Addressing Economic and Social Rights Violations by Non-state Actors through the Role of the State: A Comparison of Regional Approaches to the'Obligation to Protect' 8. Bonita C. Meyersfeld (2009),'Opuz v Turkey: Confirming the State Obligation to Combat Domestic Violence' PART II NATIONAL LEGAL ORDERS 9. Mark Tushnet (2003),'The Issue of State Action / Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law' 10. Aharon Barak (2001),'Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law' 11. Dawn Oliver and Jorg Fedtke (2007),'Comparative Analysis' PART III INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 12. Institute of International Law (2003),'The Application of International Humanitarian Law and Fundamental Human Rights in Armed Conflicts in Which Non-State Entities are Parties: Berlin Resolution of 25th August 1999 (commentary de Robert Kolb) Collection'Resolutions' No. 1' 13. Marko Milanovic and Tatjana Papic (2009),'As Bad as it Gets: The European Court of Human Rights's Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law' 14. Ralph Wilde (2008),'Understanding the International Territorial Administration Accountability Deficit: Trusteeship and the Legitimacy of International Organizations' PART IV CORPORATIONS 15. David Weissbrodt (2005),'Business and Human Rights' 16. Odette Murray, David Kinley and Chip Pitts (2011),'Exaggerated Rumours of the Death of an Alien Tort? Corporations, Human Rights and the Remarkable Case of Kiobel' 17. John Ruggie (2011),'Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework' 18. Jose E. Alvarez (2011),'Are Corporations'Subjects' of International Law?' 19. John H. Knox (2008),'Horizontal Human Rights Law' 20. International Commission of Jurists (2008)'Report of the International Commission of Jurists Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes' 21. Harold Hongju Koh (2004),'Separating Myth from Reality About Corporate Responsibility Litigation' 22. David Scheffer and Caroline Kaeb (2010),'The Five Levels of CSR Compliance: The Resiliency of Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute and the Case for a Counterattack Strategy in Compliance Theory' 23. Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners (2011), Esther Kiobel, individually and on behalf of her late husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel, et al., petitioners v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al, the Supreme Court of the United States of America 24. Brief of the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Kingdom of the Netherlands as Amici Curiae in Support of the Respondents (2012), Esther Kiobel, et al., Petitioners, v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., Respondents, the Supreme Court of the United States of America 25. Brief Amici Curiae of Former UN Special Representative for Business and Human Rights, Professor John Ruggie; Professor Philip Alston; and the Global Justice Clinic at NYU School of Law in Support of Neither Party (2012), Esther Kiobel, et al., Petitioners v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., Respondents, the Supreme Court of the United States of America PART V REBEL GROUPS 26. Nigel S. Rodley (1993),'Can Armed Opposition Groups Violate Human Rights?' 27. Sandesh Sivakumaran (2006),'Binding Armed Opposition Groups' 28. Frederick Rawski (2009),'Engaging with Armed Groups: A Human Rights Field Perspective from Nepal' 29. Marco Sassoli and Laura M. Olson (2008),'The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law Where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-international Armed Conflicts' 30. Sandesh Sivakumaran (2009),'Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?'
650		0	_aInternational law and human rights.
650		0	_aNon-state actors (International relations)
650		0	_aHuman rights.
700	1		_aClapham, Andrew, _eeditor of compilation.
856	4	1	_3Table of contents only _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy14pdf04/2013946803.html
907			_a.b15887686 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC74.3.H834 2
914			_avtls003557906
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2014-12-04 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15887686
999			_c568474 _d568474