000			03183cam a2200361 a 4500
005			20250918172128.0
008			121224s2012 enka bi 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107005822 _cRM327.64
039		9	_a201310171557 _blan _c201310080922 _dhamudah _c201310080922 _dhamudah _c201307301703 _dzaina _y12-24-2012 _zrasyilla
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC _dUKM
090			_aP301.5.P75D356
090			_aP301.5.P75 _bD356
100	1		_aDancygier, Barbara.
245	1	4	_aThe language of stories : _ba cognitive approach / _cBarbara Dancygier.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_axi, 228 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 205-224) and index.
520			_a'How do we read stories? How do they engage our minds and create meaning? Are they a mental construct, a linguistic one or a cultural one? What is the difference between real stories and fictional ones? This book addresses such questions by describing the conceptual and linguistic underpinnings of narrative interpretation. Barbara Dancygier discusses literary texts as linguistic artifacts, describing the processes which drive the emergence of literary meaning. If a text means something to someone, she argues, there have to be linguistic phenomena that make it possible. Drawing on blending theory and construction grammar, the book focuses its linguistic lens on the concepts of the narrator and the story, and defines narrative viewpoint in a new way. The examples come from a wide spectrum of texts, primarily novels and drama, by authors such as William Shakespeare, Margaret Atwood, Philip Roth, Dave Eggers, Jan Potocki and Mikhail Bulgakov'-- _cProvided by publisher.
520			_a'The relationship between language and literature is a contentious issue. On the one hand, it may simply be described as a relationship between raw material and a finished product - language provides the basis on which creative and unique works of literature emerge. On the other hand, once we look at meaning, the dividing lines begin to fade - it is difficult to define a sharp boundary separating the meaning of literary works and the meaning of other texts. One way of downplaying the obvious links is to claim that fiction engages knowledge much broader and culturally specific than every-day use of language does. But that would be an exaggeration. One could not follow an ordinary discussion of, say, climate change if one did not have any prior knowledge of the issue'-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aLanguage and languages _xStyle _xPsychological aspects.
650		0	_aCognitive grammar.
650		0	_aDiscourse analysis, Literary.
907			_a.b15546834 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kP301.5.P75D356
914			_avtls003520472
990			_azsz
991			_aInstitut Kajian Etnik
991			_aFakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
998			_at _b2012-11-12 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15546834
999			_c537642 _d537642