000			02881nam a2200373 a 4500
005			20250918171954.0
008			121120s2012 enka b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107012073 ( hbk) _cRM279.90
039		9	_a201307291157 _bbaiti _c201307231036 _drasyilla _y11-20-2012 _zrasyilla
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC _dUKM
090			_aBJ1451.S743
090			_aBJ1451 _b.S743
100	1		_aStern, Robert, _d1962-
245	1	0	_aUnderstanding moral obligation : _bKant, Hegel, Kierkegaard / _cRobert Stern.
260			_aCambridge ; _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_axiv, 277 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
490	0		_aModern European philosophy
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 255-272) and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: Acknowledgements; References and abbreviations; Introduction; Part I. Kant: 1. Kant, moral realism, and the argument from autonomy; 2. The argument from autonomy and the problem of moral obligation; 3. Kant's solution to the problem of moral obligation; Part II. Hegel: 4. Hegel's critique of Kant (via Schiller); 5. Hegel's solution to the problem of moral obligation; Part III. Kierkegaard: 6. Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel; 7. Kierkegaard's solution to the problem of moral obligation; Conclusion: from Kant to Kierkegaard - and back again?; Bibliography.
520			_a'In many histories of modern ethics, Kant is supposed to have ushered in an anti-realist or constructivist turn by holding that unless we ourselves'author' or lay down moral norms and values for ourselves, our autonomy as agents will be threatened. In this book, Robert Stern challenges the cogency of this'argument from autonomy', and claims that Kant never subscribed to it. Rather, it is not value realism but the apparent obligatoriness of morality that really poses a challenge to our autonomy: how can this be accounted for without taking away our freedom? The debate the book focuses on therefore concerns whether this obligatoriness should be located in ourselves (Kant), in others (Hegel) or in God (Kierkegaard). Stern traces the historical dialectic that drove the development of these respective theories, and clearly and sympathetically considers their merits and disadvantages; he concludes by arguing that the choice between them remains open'-- _cProvided by publisher.
600	1	0	_aKant, Immanuel, _d1724-1804.
600	1	0	_aHegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, _d1770-1831.
600	1	0	_aKierkegaard, S{u296E}, _d1813-1855.
650		0	_aDuty.
650		0	_aResponsibility.
650		7	_aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General. _2bisacsh
907			_a.b15525594 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kBJ1451.S743
914			_avtls003518236
990			_abaiti
991			_aFakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
998			_at _b2012-07-11 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15525594
999			_c535583 _d535583