000			03037cam a2200361 a 4500
005			20250930133735.0
008			120803s2012 enk b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107017078 (hardback) _cRM367.19
039		9	_a201403061254 _badnan _c201403041648 _dmasrul _y08-03-2012 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dUKM
090			_aC74.3.L346 2
090			_aC74.3 _b.L346 2
100	1		_aLarsen, Kjetil Mujezinovic, _d1976-
245	1	4	_aThe human rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / _cKjetil Mujezinovic Larsen.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_axlii, 473 p. ; _c25 cm.
490	0		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v93
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction and overview; 2. The emerging relevance of human rights law in UN-mandated peace operations; 3. The other side of the coin: the alleged inappropriateness of applying human rights treaties in UN-mandated peace operations; 4. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae; 5. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci; 6. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts; 7. Derogations; 8. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties; 9. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states; 10. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions; 11. Conclusions.
520			_a'Do States, through their military forces, have legal obligations under human rights treaties towards the local civilian population during UN-mandated peace operations? It is frequently claimed that it is unrealistic to require compliance with human rights treaties in peace operations and this has led to an unwillingness to hold States accountable for human rights violations. In this book, Kjetil Larsen criticises this position by addressing the arguments against the applicability of human rights treaties and demonstrating that compliance with the treaties is unrealistic only if one takes an'all or nothing' approach to them. He outlines a coherent and more flexible approach which distinguishes clearly between positive and negative obligations and makes treaty compliance more realistic. His proposals for the application of human rights treaties would also strengthen the legal framework for human rights protection in peace operations without posing any unrealistic obligations on the military forces'-- _cProvided by publisher.
610	2	0	_aUnited Nations _xPeacekeeping forces.
650		0	_aHuman rights monitoring.
650		0	_aTreaties.
650		0	_aPeacekeeping forces _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aConflict management. _959485
907			_a.b15444004 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC74.3.L346 2
914			_avtls003509681
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2012-03-08 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15444004
999			_c527726 _d527726