000			03113nam a2200361 a 4500
005			20250930133525.0
008			120606s2012 flua b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781439857496 (hbk.) _cRM460.35
020			_a1439857490 (hbk.)
039		9	_a201307190957 _bzainol _c201305071555 _dfida _c201206181510 _dzabidah _c201206061638 _dfarid _y06-06-2012 _zfarid
040			_dUKM
090			_aT57.95.Y643 3
090			_aT57.95 _b.Y643 3
090			_aT57.95 _b.Y54p 2012 9
100	1		_aYoe, Charles E.
245	1	0	_aPrinciples of risk analysis : _bdecision making under uncertainty / _cCharles Yoe.
260			_aBoca Raton, FL : _bCRC Press, _c2012.
300			_axxi, 561 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aFood science & technology
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_a'Preface I did not want to write this book. I wanted to buy it. Risk analysis is mature enough that it needs a principles text. There are many wonderful books available on the subject of risk. In fact, for years, in the training I have done, I used to schlep a dozen of them around for students to peruse. These I called the starter library. I urged people to buy them. Eventually I stopped carrying the books with me and started looking for that one book that would introduce students and professionals to the integrated topic of risk analysis. I never found it. So, I decided to go ahead and write it. Risk analysis is a very parochial subject matter and practice. There are many tribes of risk practitioners, and they speak many dialects. To be honest, I am not entirely sure the field is ready for anything one might call a principles text. We may never have enough agreement on the principles to so ordain them as a community of practice. Nonetheless, it has been my great fortune to have worked with a lot of people on many different applications of the risk analysis decision-making paradigm. This has included natural disasters, engineering, food safety, food defense, environmental issues, animals and plants, trade, quality management, business, finance, terrorism, defense applications, research, and other risk analysis applications. No matter how much the words and models changed from one application to the next, I found the basic principles were rather constant. Everyone was struggling to figure out how best to make good decisions when there are so many things we just don't know for sure. My major accomplishment in all of this was simply to learn the jargon of each field; then I stole liberally from the other fields, adapting ideas, methodologies, and models from one field'--Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aDecision making. _959541
650		0	_aRisk assessment.
830		0	_aFood science and technology (CRC Press)
907			_a.b15389868 _b2019-11-12 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kT57.95.Y643 3
914			_avtls003503775
990			_aza
991			_aFakulti Kejuruteraan & Alam Bina (FKAB)
991			_aProgram Kesihatan Persekitaran dan Keselamatan Industri, KKL
998			_ad _at _b2012-06-06 _cm _da _feng _gflu _y0 _z.b15389868
999			_c522490 _d522490