000			02842nam a2200349 a 4500
005			20250918153114.0
008			120409s2012 nyu b 001 0 eng
010			_a2011-016378
020			_a9780415898553 (hbk.) _cRM390.04
039		9	_a201207192108 _bzabidah _c201206271540 _drahah _c201204091227 _drahah _y04-09-2012 _zrahah
040			_dUKM
090			_aR725.5.B568
090			_aR725.5 _b.B568
245	0	0	_aBioethics, public moral argument, and social responsibility / _cedited by Nancy M. P. King and Michael J. Hyde.
260			_aNew York : _bRoutledge, _c2012.
300			_axv, 179 p. ; _c24 cm.
490	0		_aRoutledge annals of bioethics.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_a'Bioethics, Public Moral Argument, and Social Responsibility explores the role of democratically oriented argument in promoting public understanding and discussion of the benefits and burdens of biotechnological progress. The contributors examine moral and policy controversies surrounding biomedical technologies and their place in American society, beginning with an examination of discourse and moral authority in democracy, and addressing a set of issues that include: dignity in health care; the social responsibilities of scientists, journalists, and scholars; and the language of genetics and moral responsibility. Much discussion of biotechnological advances rests on the rights of individuals to make autonomous choices and on societal decisions not to interfere with willing buyers and sellers. But intensifying democratic debates about key issues like health insurance reform and genetic research have begun to broaden our public vision, to include awareness of cost, a sense of collective responsibility to help others, and the need to work together to set limits we can live with. In scholarly journals, newspapers, magazines, on television, radio, and hundreds of web sites, public moral argument about the benefits and burdens of biotechnology is ubiquitous. Science and society have thus created an increasingly fragmented discourse, which we need to examine together. The book's authors, experts from the sciences and humanities, step beyond their disciplinary boundaries to assume the ethical responsibility of translating their expertise into forms that help promote fruitful public conversation.'-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aMedical ethics _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aBioethics _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aBiotechnology _xPhilosophy.
700	1		_aKing, Nancy M. P.
700	1		_aHyde, Michael J., _d1950-
907			_a.b15319544 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kR725.5.B568
914			_avtls003496048
990			_aza
991			_aFakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan
998			_at _b2012-09-04 _cm _da _feng _gnyu _y0 _z.b15319544
999			_c515807 _d515807