| 000 | 02740nam a22003254a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250918150345.0 | ||
| 008 | 111220s2011 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 020 |
_a9780521882071 (hbk.) _cRM277.47 |
||
| 020 | _a0521882079 (hbk.) | ||
| 039 | 9 |
_a201401091714 _brosli _c201312301412 _dmazarita _c201209241616 _dmazarita _y12-20-2011 _zbinar |
|
| 040 | _dUKM | ||
| 090 | _aTA160.S275 | ||
| 090 |
_aTA160 _b.S275 |
||
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aScience as psychology : _bsense-making and identity in science practice / _cLisa M. Osbeck ... [et al.]. |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011. |
||
| 300 |
_aviii, 279 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction: science and persons; 2. Methods of study; 3. The problem-solving person; 4. The feeling person; 5. The positioning person; 6. The person negotiating cultural identities; 7. The learning person; 8. Epilogue: science as psychology: a tacit tradition and its implications. | |
| 520 | _a'Science as Psychology reveals the complexity and richness of rationality by demonstrating how social relationships, emotion, culture, and identity are implicated in the problem-solving practices of laboratory scientists. In this study, the authors gather and analyze interview and observational data from innovation-focused laboratories in the engineering sciences to show how the complex practices of laboratory research scientists provide rich psychological insights, and how a better understanding of science practice facilitates understanding of human beings more generally. The study focuses not on dismantling the rational core of scientific practice, but on illustrating how social, personal, and cognitive processes are intricately woven together in scientific thinking. The authors argue that this characterization illustrates a way of addressing the integration problem in science studies - how to characterize the fluid entanglements of cognitive, affective, material, cultural, and other dimensions of discovery and problem solving. Drawing on George Kelly's'person as scientist' metaphor, the authors extend the implications of this analysis to general psychology. The book is thus a contribution to science studies, the psychology of science, and general psychology'--Provided by publisher. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aEngineering _xResearch. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aProblem-solving _xSocial aspects. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aOsbeck, Lisa M., _d1962- |
|
| 907 |
_a.b15215933 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12 |
||
| 942 |
_c01 _n0 _kTA160.S275 |
||
| 914 | _avtls003485013 | ||
| 990 | _ark4 | ||
| 991 | _aFakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan | ||
| 998 |
_at _b2011-07-12 _cm _da _feng _gnyu _y0 _z.b15215933 |
||
| 999 |
_c505709 _d505709 |
||