000			03372cam a2200361 i 4500
005			20250918143945.0
008			110822t2011 enka b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781107005440 (hardback) _cRM372.90
039		9	_a201206191450 _badnan _c201205091349 _dmasrul _y08-22-2011 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dUKM
090			_aC61.1.W694 2
090			_aC61.1 _b.W694 2
245	0	0	_aWTO disciplines on agricultural support : _bseeking a fair basis for trade / _cedited by David Orden, David Blandford, Tim Josling.
246	3		_aWorld Trade Organization disciplines on agricultural support
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011.
300			_axxiv, 494 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: Part I. Overview of Domestic Support Issues and WTO Rules: 1. Introduction David Orden, David Blandford and Tim Josling; 2. The WTO disciplines on domestic support Lars Brink; Part II. Developed Countries: Have High Levels of Support Come Down?: 3. European Union Tim Josling and Alan Swinbank; 4. United States David Blandford and David Orden; 5. Japan Yoshihisa Godo and Daisuke Takahashi; 6. Norway Ivar Gaasland, Roberto Garcia and Erling Vardal; Part III. Developing Countries: Will Low Levels of Support Rise?: 7. Brazil Andre Nassar; 8. India Munisamy Gopinath; 9. China Fuzhi Cheng; 10. Philippines Caesar B. Cororaton; Part IV. Looking Forward: Can Fair Markets Be Achieved?: 11. The difficult task of disciplining domestic support David Orden, David Blandford and Tim Josling; Appendix A. Domestic support provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture; Appendix B. Domestic support provisions of the Doha draft modalities.
520			_a'Farm support is contentious in international negotiations. This in-depth assessment of the legal compliance and economic evaluation issues raised by the WTO Agreement on Agriculture presents consistent support data and forward-looking projections for eight developed and developing countries (EU, US, Japan, Norway, Brazil, China, India, Philippines), using original estimates where official notifications are not available. Variations over time in notified support in some cases reflect real policy changes; others merely reflect shifts in how countries represent their measures. The stalled Doha negotiations presage significantly tighter constraints for developed countries that provide the highest support, but loopholes will persist. Developing countries face fewer constraints and their trade-distorting farm support can rise. Pressure points and key remaining issues if a Doha agreement is reached are evaluated. Vigilant monitoring for compliance of farm support with WTO commitments will be required to lessen its negative consequences whether or not the Doha Round is concluded'-- _cProvided by publisher.
610	2	0	_aWorld Trade Organization.
650		0	_aTariff on farm produce.
650		0	_aCompetition, Unfair.
700	1		_aOrden, David.
700	1		_aBlandford, David.
700	1		_aJosling, Tim _q(Timothy Edward), _d1940-
907			_a.b15141688 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC61.1.W694 2
914			_avtls003477139
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2011-09-08 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15141688
999			_c498445 _d498445