000			03003cam a2200349 a 4500
005			20250918143942.0
008			110819s2011 enka b 001 0 eng
020			_a9780521196994 (hardback) _cRM 295.34
039		9	_a201206201203 _badnan _c201205101042 _dmasrul _y08-19-2011 _zmasrul
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC _dUKM
090			_aC47.7.W335 2
090			_aC
100	1		_aWaibel, Michael,
245	1	0	_aSovereign defaults before International courts and tribunals / _cMichael Waibel.
260			_aCambridge, UK : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011.
300			_alvi, 366 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
490	0		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v81
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 330-349) and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. Sovereign debt crises and defaults; 2. Political responses to sovereign defaults; 3. Quasi-receivership of highly indebted countries; 4. Monetary reform and sovereign debt; 5. Financial necessity; 6. National settlement institutions; 7. Arbitration on sovereign debt; 8. Arbitration clauses in sovereign debt instruments; 9. Creditor protection in international law; 10. ICSID arbitration on sovereign debt; 11. Overlapping jurisdiction over sovereign debt; 12. Sovereign default as trigger of responsibility; 13. Compensation on sovereign debt; 14. Building durable institutions for adjudicating sovereign defaults.
520			_a'International law on sovereign defaults is underdeveloped because States have largely refrained from adjudicating disputes arising out of public debt. The looming new wave of sovereign defaults is likely to shift dispute resolution away from national courts to international tribunals and transform the current regime for restructuring sovereign debt. Michael Waibel assesses how international tribunals balance creditor claims and sovereign capacity to pay across time. The history of adjudicating sovereign defaults internationally over the last 150 years offers a rich repository of experience for future cases: US state defaults, quasi-receiverships in the Dominican Republic and Ottoman Empire, the Venezuela Preferential Case, the Soviet repudiation in 1917, the League of Nations, the World War Foreign Debt Commission, Germany's 30-year restructuring after 1918 and ICSID arbitration on Argentina's default in 2001. The remarkable continuity in international practice and jurisprudence suggests avenues for building durable institutions capable of resolving future sovereign defaults'-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aDebts, Public _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aDebts, External _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aArbitration (International law).
650		0	_aInternational courts.
907			_a.b15140982 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kC47.7.W335 2
914			_avtls003477062
990			_amab
991			_aFakulti Undang-Undang
998			_au _b2011-06-08 _cm _da _feng _genk _y0 _z.b15140982
999			_c498377 _d498377