000 03475nam a22004214a 4500
005 20250918142615.0
008 110718s2010 enkab b 001 0 eng
020 _a9780521190411 (hbk.)
_cRM261.80
020 _a052119041X
020 _a9780521165457 (pbk.)
020 _a0521165458 (pbk.)
039 9 _a201205161056
_brosli
_c201204101330
_drosli
_c201204101327
_drosli
_c201203291838
_dmazarita
_y07-18-2011
_zmazarita
040 _dUKM
043 _aae-----
090 _aJQ750.A58S63
090 _aJQ750.A58
_bS63
100 1 _aSlater, Dan,
_d1971-
245 1 0 _aOrdering power :
_bcontentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia /
_cDan Slater
260 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2010
300 _axviii, 319 p. :
_bill., map ;
_c24 cm.
490 1 _aCambridge studies in comparative politics
504 _aIncludes biblographical references (p. 293-309) and index.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 8 _aMachine generated contents note: Part I. The Puzzles and Arguments: 1. To extract and to organize; 2. States and the regimes that run them; Part II. Contentious Politics and the Institutions of Order: 3. Colonialism, cleavages, and the contours of contention; 4. Mobilization and countermobilization amid colonial retreat; 5. Varieties of violence in authoritarian onset; Part III. The Foundations and Fates of Authoritarian Leviathans: 6. Protection and provision in authoritarian leviathans; 7. Contentious politics and the struggle for democratization; Part IV. Extending the Arguments: 8. Congruent cases in Southeast Asia; 9. The consequences of contention.
520 _a'Like the postcolonial world more generally, Southeast Asia exhibits tremendous variation in state capacity and authoritarian durability. Ordering Power draws on theoretical insights dating back to Thomas Hobbes to develop a unified framework for explaining both of these political outcomes. States are especially strong and dictatorships especially durable when they have their origins in'protection pacts': broad elite coalitions unified by shared support for heightened state power and tightened authoritarian controls as bulwarks against especially threatening and challenging types of contentious politics. These coalitions provide the elite collective action underpinning strong states, robust ruling parties, cohesive militaries, and durable authoritarian regimes - all at the same time. Comparative-historical analysis of seven Southeast Asian countries (Burma, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Vietnam, and Thailand) reveals that subtly divergent patterns of contentious politics after World War II provide the best explanation for the dramatic divergence in Southeast Asia's contemporary states and regimes'--Provided by publisher.
650 0 _aAuthoritarianism
_zSoutheast Asia.
651 0 _aSoutheast Asia
_xPolitics and government
_y21st century.
830 0 _aCambridge studies in comparative politics.
856 4 1 _3Table of contents only
_uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1007/2010013569-t.html
907 _a.b15100054
_b2021-05-28
_c2019-11-12
942 _c01
_n0
_kJQ750.A58S63
914 _avtls003472686
990 _ark4
991 _aFakulti Sains Sosial & Kemanusiaan
998 _at
_b2011-05-07
_cm
_da
_feng
_genk
_y0
_z.b15100054
999 _c494374
_d494374