000			03441cam a2200325 a 4500
005			20250918140504.0
008			110421s2010 miu bi 001 0 eng
020			_a9780737747409 (hbk.) _cRM121.88
020			_a0737747404 (hbk.)
039		9	_a201108081020 _bariff _c201107211107 _didah _c201104211648 _didah _y04-21-2011 _zidah
040			_aUKM
090			_aKF.S457
090			_aKF _b.S457
245	0	0	_aSex discrimination / _cNo襬 Merino, book editor.
260			_aFarmington Hills, MI : _bGreenhaven Press, _c2010.
300			_a190 p. ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aIssues on trial
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0	0	_aSex discrimination in military benefits -- Case overview: Frontiero v. Richardson (1973). The court's decision: differential treatment of men and women is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- The statute in question treating men and women differently is reasonable / Erwin N. Griswold, Harlington Wood Jr., Mark L. Evans -- The decision in Frontiero was a key step toward equality for women / Christine Basic -- The Frontiero decision helped women achieve equality in the military / Lory Manning -- The reasoning in Frontiero protecting women supports protection of homosexuals / Thomas B. Scheffey -- Striking down statutes requiring alimony only of men -- Case overview: Orr v. Orr (1979). The court's decision: legislation distributing benefits and burdens by gender is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: no sex discrimination exists for an individual who is not harmed / William H. Rehnquist -- Men receiving alimony still suffer stigmatization years after Orr / Anita Raghavan -- Women are increasingly paying alimony as equality requires / Betsy Schiffman -- Upholding affirmative action for working women -- Case overview: Johnson v. Transportation Agency (1987). The court's decision: taking account of sex in order to eliminate underrepresentation in employment is constitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: in employment, taking sex into account for any reason is sex discrimination / Antonin Scalia -- Brennanism / Daniel Seligman -- The relevance of Johnson for ad hoc affirmative action is unclear / Michael Starr and Adam J. Heft -- Validating limits on suing employers for sex discrimination -- Case overview: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007). The court's decision: filing for pay discrimination is subject to time limits / Samuel A. Alito Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: current pay disparities between men and women are acts of sex discrimination / Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- Ledbetter was not unjustly decided / Stuart Taylor Jr. -- Congress should overturn Ledbetter / Dahlia Lithwick -- The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act will create many problems / Andrew M. Grossman.
520			_aPresents articles regarding sex discrimination in the United States, including cases relating to military benefits, divorce settlements, affirmative action for women, and sex discrmination in the workplace.
650		0	_aSex discrimination _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States _xCases _vJuvenile literature.
700	1		_aMerino, Noel.
830		0	_aIssues on trial.
907			_a.b15012104 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12
942			_c01 _n0 _kKF.S457
914			_avtls003463450
991			_aFakulti Sains Sosial & Kemanusiaan
998			_at _b2011-08-04 _cm _da _feng _gmiu _y0 _z.b15012104
999			_c485962 _d485962