| 000 | 03166cam a22003378a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250918000556.0 | ||
| 008 | 080908s2008 nyua bi 001 0 eng | ||
| 020 |
_a0230538711 (alk. paper) _cRM302.50 |
||
| 039 | 9 |
_a201305171622 _blan _c200812301151 _dlan _c200812301138 _dlan _c200812151156 _drahah _y09-08-2008 _zrahah |
|
| 040 | _dUKM | ||
| 090 | _aHD61.J334 | ||
| 090 |
_aHD61 _b.J334 |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aJablonowski, Mark, _d1955- |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRisk dilemmas : _bforced choices and survival / _cMark Jablonowski. |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bPalgrave MacMillan, _c2007. |
||
| 300 |
_aix, 137 p. : _bill. ; _c23 cm. |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aA review of high-stakes risk criteria. Formalizing risky decisions. The expected value criterion. Decision criteria when probability is unknown, or irrelevant. Conditions of indifference between fatalism and precaution. A fuzzy representation of danger -- Finding alternatives to risk. The preactionary approach. Identifying alternatives using backcasting. Backcasting under uncertainty. Backcasting versus backtracking. Maintaining the balance of life. Contrasting the'post-fact' approach. Cost/ benefit and post-fact risk management. Avoiding mechanistic precaution. Risk acceptance--risk avoidance--risk anticipation -- Risk avoidance : all or nothing. How risk grows. Why prioritization fails. Pragmatic arguments for not adding risks. Satisfying the burden of proof. A possibilistic model of catastrophic potentials. Is there a'natural' level of risk. On the notion of'selective fatalism.' Selective fatalism and dilemmas. The'tolerability' compromise -- Precaution in context. The hallmarks of precaution. Context and risk acceptance criteria. The problem of valuation. Inter-contextual effects of precaution. Alternatives assessment across contexts. The need for coordinated goals. A reassessment of risk assesssment. Using risk assessments the right way. Identifying high-stakes risks and their mechanisms. Decision theoretic models. Integrating fuzzy risk thresholds -- Can we avoid risk dilemmas? The only two options. Facing the paradox of progress. Risk dilemmas and self-interest. The prospect of'infinite disutility.' The need for a wider approach to science. Radical rethinking. Science to the rescue? The dangers of giving up -- Summary and conclusion (of sorts). Understanding high-stakes decision processes. Making precaution work. How do current regimes compare? Doing the right thing. Who will lead the way?. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aRisk management. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aEmergency management. | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Contributor biographical information _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0809/2007048688-b.html. |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Publisher description _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0809/2007048688-d.html. |
| 856 | 4 | 1 |
_3Table of contents only _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0809/2007048688-t.html. |
| 907 |
_a.b14270407 _b2021-05-28 _c2019-11-12 |
||
| 942 |
_c01 _n0 _kHD61.J334 |
||
| 914 | _avtls003385471 | ||
| 990 | _arab | ||
| 991 | _aFakulti Ekonomi Perniagaan | ||
| 998 |
_at _b2008-08-09 _cm _da _feng _gnyu _y0 _z.b14270407 |
||
| 999 |
_c422113 _d422113 |
||