Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Review of CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3 [electronic resource] : decison- support experiments and evaluations using seasonal to interannual forecasts and observational data / Panel to Review CCSP Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.3: Decision-Support Experiments and Evaluations Using Seasonal to Interannual Forecasts and Observational Data ; Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Center for Economic, Governance and International Studies, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council of the National Academies.

Contributor(s): Publication details: Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, c2008.Description: 1 online resource (ix, 46 p.) : illISBN:
  • 9780309115698 (electronic bk.)
  • 0309115698 (electronic bk.)
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Review of CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3.DDC classification:
  • 551.5 22
LOC classification:
  • QC861.3 .R48 2008eb
Online resources: Summary: This study offered an independent peer review for a synthetic document being produced for the CCSP. It found the draft document to be in a fairly early stage of development and noted several issues needing attention in the revision. The draft was inconsistent across sections with respect to whether or not it accepted two assumptions: that more skillful forecasts necessarily have greater value, and that the most useful form of information is a projected future value of an outcome parameter with an uncertainty distribution. Available scientific evidence gives reason to question these assumptions, and the draft did not discuss the evidence. Among other issues needing attention, the review called for the revised draft to do more to substantiate its claims of the potential benefits of knowledge-action networks and to give more careful consideration to the appropriate balance of roles between governmental and private efforts.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Description based on print version record.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 40-42).

This study offered an independent peer review for a synthetic document being produced for the CCSP. It found the draft document to be in a fairly early stage of development and noted several issues needing attention in the revision. The draft was inconsistent across sections with respect to whether or not it accepted two assumptions: that more skillful forecasts necessarily have greater value, and that the most useful form of information is a projected future value of an outcome parameter with an uncertainty distribution. Available scientific evidence gives reason to question these assumptions, and the draft did not discuss the evidence. Among other issues needing attention, the review called for the revised draft to do more to substantiate its claims of the potential benefits of knowledge-action networks and to give more careful consideration to the appropriate balance of roles between governmental and private efforts.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Contact Us

Perpustakaan Tun Seri Lanang, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan,Malaysia
+603-89213446 – Consultation Services
019-2045652 – Telegram/Whatsapp
Email: helpdeskptsl@ukm.edu.my

Copyright ©The National University of Malaysia Library